💧ZARD Emissions Schedule
Token inflation
ve(3,3) Dynamics
The main stakeholders of a typical AMM, including veZARD holders, LPs, users, and protocols, are all aligned by the ve(3,3) dynamics that determine ZARD emissions.
veZARD holders — are incentivized to vote either for the highest volume pools (because the greater the volume, the greater the amount of fees produced as a result), or the ones being bribed by protocols seeking to bootstrap their liquidity. This allows these protocols to create their own flywheel, if the token generates strong volume.
Liquidity Providers (LPs) — are incentivized with emissions driven by “Real Yield” based metrics.
Traders — benefit from the low slippage thanks to the liquidity provided, in concert with the latest and greatest battle-tested vAMM / sAMM tech.
Protocols — have access to a cooperation oriented liquidity layer. They benefit from capital efficient trading conditions for their tokens, and they can incentivize their liquidity via bribes offered to veZARD holders.
Emissions specifications
Weekly emissions (at inception): 30,240
ZARDWeekly emissions decay: 1%
Weekly developer wallet allocation: 5%
Weekly
veZARDrebase: Up to 30%Emissions for liquidity providers: 65%
First Week Emissions are fairly low when compared to Liquid Tokens Available (POL + Claimable Tokens). 30,240 ZARD accounts for 11.2% of Liquid tokens only, which is much lower than other ve3,3 forks where first week emission accounts for 30% to 130%. This ensures lower sell pressure and protection of token value for our seed investors.
Last updated